Why Device Agents Don't Equal Security
Find out why agent-based MDM/MAM tools increase risk, and how agentless security keeps users private and compliant.

Transcript
If you've ever rolled out a mobile security program, you've probably said these four words: Just install the agent. For years, we've assumed that if a device has an MDM agent on it, it's safe. But today, I'm going to tell you why that assumption is dangerous. Because device agents do not equal securityin fact, they are often the most fragile part of your stack.
The problem is architectural, as agents require trust. They have to run inside the environment they are supposed to secure. It's really a paradox. You are trusting the device to protect you from the device.
If a phone is rooted, jailbroken, or infected with kernel level malware, it can lie to the agent. It can even fake a health check. The agent reports back all green while the malware is quietly exfiltrating your data in the background. Then there is the maintenance nightmare.
Agents break, OS updates break them, or users disable them. Managing a fleet of thousands of agents on thousands of different personal phones is a losing battle. You are literally chasing ghosts. So what's the alternative?
Agentless security. Hypori eliminates the agent entirely using virtual mobile infrastructure, VMI. Instead of installing software on the endpoint, we move the workspace to the cloud. Access happens through secure pixel streaming.
This means that there is no code to reverse engineer, no agent to bypass, and no data to steal. We don't need to trust the device because the device never receives enterprise data or executable code. Malware on the physical phone can't jump the stream. The attack surface is zero.
Next up, we're going to tackle the biggest headache of all, BYOD. See you in the next lesson.
Blogs
Learn More
Go to Module 4
Why Device Agents Don't Equal Security


